"Death is...whimsical...today."
-Gary Oldman,
The ProfessionalIn today's lesson from the streets of Southern City, a light tragedy in three acts, that transpired over a recent midnight shift:
ACT I began at about 0200 hrs, when Sgt. Rudy and I got a call for a traffic accident on the interstate onramp. We raced to the scene, and found that three cruisers from the Neighboring Jurisdiction Police Department were already there, having stumbled on the wreck just before we got the call. There was a smallish SUV lying on its right side in the middle of the winding onramp, its headlights gleaming back down at us, the radio still obliviously tumpeting out the local alterna-rock station.
Two civilians stood near the concrete median, an ashen young man who stared at me with a shaken expression as I approached, and a slim young woman who was leaning against the guardrail, her hand covering her downturned face.
"There's your driver," one of the NJPD cops told me with a grin, indicating the woman and adding, "I have a talent for stating the obvious."
After asking the guy if he was okay (he had actually been in another vehicle, and stopped ahead when he saw the wreck), I turned to the woman. "Ma'am, are you all right?"
As my flashlight washed over her, she pulled her hand away and looked up at me with a bemused expression. Her face was a mask of blood. It cut in streams down from a nasty slice up near her hairline, spattering her clothes with dark splotches that hadn't been visible in the shadows. Her hand was smeared red. It struck me at that second exactly what the NJPD guy had meant.
"Never mind," I told her. "EMS is on the way."
She had been leaving the local Devil's Island watering hole (where, she admitted to me in a dazed voice, she had downed a couple of whisky drinks), and was going up to the interstate, when she took the curve too fast, tried to correct in order to avoid sliding off the embankment, and bounced off the divider, rolling the car over. She hadn't been wearing a seatbelt, and had ricocheted like a pinball around the passenger compartment, finally coming to rest on top of the shattered glass of the passenger window as the car lay on its side, leaking a sizable pool of blood on the asphalt. Scattered around the chassis was the detritus of a 23-year-old woman's life: a lot of mix CDs, a university ID, a large amount of small bills (she was a waitress, drinking a little of her tip money after a hard night), a bonus card from some discount mall-rat jewelry store promising a free silver earring with X number of purchases, with a couple of stamps on it. All of it was covered over with blood (in particular the cash, which we inventoried carefully. At some point I remember making a lame wisecrack about "blood money"). I picked through it all, looking for her driver's license. She finally knelt down next to me and pointed it out. I had missed it the first time, because it was completely covered with a bright layer of red. She giggled a little dizzily over that.
One of the accident specialists from our traffic division showed up to work the wreck, which made me very glad. I hate the traffic accident forms, which resemble nothing so much as the Rosetta stone reproduced on carbon paper. The girl went to the hospital, the tow truck flipped the car over and shoveled the broken glass and blood into a bucket. The traffic guy headed to the hospital to give her her paperwork and tickets (I don't know if he actually charged her with DUI, but I suspect he did not). I checked my uniform carefully for blood contamination, and got back on the street. I don't know whether she was okay at the hospital or not.
ACT II came at about 0800, right at the end of the shift. We received a call from Swampgas Acres, a secluded and half-developed stretch of large houses near the Devil's Island golf complex. Two construction workers had gone into the woods near the creek to look for a fishing spot for their lunch hour, and found a dead man in a pickup truck, parked in a small clearing right against the creek bank.
We were on the overlap with the next shift, so they dispatched someone else, but I was right nearby at the time, so I headed over and was the first car on the scene. The two workers flagged me down and directed me to the spot, which was along a dirt path off of the cul-de-sac at the tip of the development. I headed back into the bushes on foot, and came up on a pickup truck, the engine still running, a rubber hose going from the exhaust pipe into the window. The glass was all covered in moisture, but through them I could see a middle-aged man slumped over. Even if the construction guys hadn't verified his state before I arrived, I knew he was dead. He didn't look "natural", or "sleeping", or any of that - he looked like a wax sculpture, the odd dull sheen of the freshly dead covering him.
I won't go into too much detail here, but suffice it to say that this guy took a great deal of care and thought in his setup; it was the most professionally done suicide I have yet encountered. We called EMS (a formality), the Crime Scene unit, and the duty lieutenant (because no crime scene is complete without someone to get in the way). A homicide detective came out, dressed in his not-bad-for-a-cop's salary suit and tasseled loafers, stepping gingerly around the mud and foliage surrounding the truck, his hands covered in latex gloves, holding a notebook and pen, poking here and there and making notes. It looked like a scene out of
Law & Order: Reiteration, slated for NBC next fall. Instead of his loved ones gathered around, this guy went to the next world attended by crackling radios, polyester uniforms, and complete strangers making bad jokes and wondering when they could go home.
I check Swampgas Acres all the time; it's one of my frequent haunts. I always use that cul-de-sac as a turnaround, but until that morning, I had never known that little spot in the trees was back there. This guy had breathed his last not thirty yards from where I conduct my routine patrols. I don't know how long he took; if I'd gone back there on one of my checks, I might have found him while he was still alive. Maybe I could have stopped him. I'll never know.
I go back there every time now. Live and learn.
I was still working the crime scene. escorting people back and forth from the interstate (Devil's Island is
terra incognita for about 90% of the SCPD), when I got diverted to go to
ACT III, which began roughly an hour after I was supposed to be home. It was a guy that Sgt. Rudy and I had dealt with before, who I'll call "Mickey" (not that
every name I use here isn't phony). Mickey is a very big guy, a glad-handing Scots-Irish sort who looks like a street fighter and used to run a restaurant. He also has major medical and psychological problems. The first time I met Mickey, Sgt. Rudy and I were dispatched to escort EMS, who were there to bring him to the hospital. Mickey is delusional, and has a violent temper that can click on without warning. He's usually outgoing, but there is always an undercurrent of menace that lies under his grin, like he's constantly calculating how heavy an object it would take to crush your skull.
Mickey was moving out of the house he shared with his soon-to-be ex-wife, and his lawyer had advised he should have police on scene, to avoid any problems. So Sgt. Rudy and I stood in the foyer, listening to Mickey and his wife politely bicker over this picture, or that TV set, etc., trying to stay attuned to minor shifts in their conversation that might signal something bad about to happen.
The strange irony in all this is that, after we had put him in the ambulance without incident in our first meeting, Mickey's family told us that his doctors had told them that they expected Mickey to stroke out and die within the next few days. I never heard anything more after that, and had basically gone the next couple of months assuming Mickey had gone on. I thought he was dead right up to the very second I saw his giant frame absurdly folded into his tiny import car that morning. He mentioned that he'd had a rough time in the hospital, but didn't elaborate. "I'm feelin' great, though," he told me. "I've lost a little weight since the last time you saw me."
He mentioned that he was soon moving to Neighboring Jurisdiction, and added with a wink and a broad grin that he "would be their problem now."
One story I don't know the ending of, another I know only the ending of, and one I thought I knew the ending of, but didn't. Some the night takes, some it doesn't.
Fuck if I can explain it. I just work here.
Ofc. Krupke at 11:01 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
25 October 2004
Know what's kind of embarrassing?
That, by the time all this mess is over, the Afghans will have conducted their
election with more efficiency (and possibly less
bloodshed) than we will.
Anyway, congratulations to President Karzai.
You just know Schroeder is thinking, "Where can I get a jacket like that? Drive all the Frauleiner up the wall with Lustverrucktlichkeit, if ya know what I mean."
Ofc. Krupke at 10:13 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
24 October 2004
Michael Moore gave an
invited lecture at Penn State as part of his "Slacker Uprising Tour", in which he urges college students to vote for John Kerry. His speaking fee was paid by the Penn State College Democrats, who raised $7,000 for the purpose. This was supplemented by a meager $23,000 from the Penn State student activities fund, into which all students pay.
Trouble is, according to fund rules, because that money is mandatory, it isn't supposed to include "appropriations to any partisan political activity, or for the support of the political campaigns of any candidate for political office." The disbursement committee shrugged at these concerns, saying that it was okay because Moore is "a prominent filmmaker and 'a significant public figure'", and therefore, presumably, not a partisan.
I will here borrow a trick from Moore, and close with a favorite quote from George Orwell:
"One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe things like that. No ordinary man would be such a fool."
Ofc. Krupke at 8:41 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
21 October 2004
Edward Prescott has endorsed President Bush on economic policy, praising Bush's top-bracket tax cuts and downplaying concerns about outsourcing.
Who, you may ask, is Edward Prescott that he would do something so boneheaded?
Oh, nobody. Just a
current holder of the Nobel Prize in Economics. That's all.
Somewhere, Paul Krugman is gripping his bottle of Glenlivet and snarling.
Ofc. Krupke at 11:14 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
19 October 2004
This story brings whole new meaning to the term, "crack political operative."
"When John Kerry is President, there will be a fat rock in every stem and a slinger on every corner."
Ofc. Krupke at 7:57 PM
Permalink |
---------------------
One of John Kerry's main campaign themes is that he is more willing, and, he insists, more capable, of working with other countries to achieve good works. Unfortunately, the other countries don't really seem to be playing ball. Beyond the flat declarations by Germany and France that they won't give military assistance in Iraq even if Bush goes, or the international community's foot-dragging on Sudan, there are a couple more reasons it's been a bad month for Kerry the internationalist:
First, we have
criticism from the Brazilian general in charge of U.N. peacekeeping operations in Haiti, who has in part blamed remarks made by Sen. Kerry for the escalating violence there. Specifically, Kerry's declaration that Jean-Bertrand Aristide was an elected leader and that Kerry would have sent American troops to protect him has, according to Gen. Augusto Heleno, re-energized the flagging morale of Aristide's violent supporters. Whether this is fair or not (I'm inclined to think not), it doesn't exactly support the idea that Kerry has the golden diplomatic touch.
Second, and perhaps more directly harmful to Kerry, is a
decision by a large number of Canadian pharmacies that they will
not fill bulk orders from the United States, which doesn't bode well for Kerry's plan to allow such purchases to ease health-care costs. The Canadians cite concerns that such sales might result in supply problems and higher prices in Canada. They don't mention any concerns that cross-border importation might also leave pharmaceutical companies without the money or the desire to research new medications, though they would likely do that as well.
In other words: thanks for the pills, Americans, and for subsidizing our low prices. Now sod off.
If Kerry expects other countries to pitch in and fix his political problems, they're bound to break his heart. But, geez, even
I thought they'd at least wait till after the election to do it.
Ofc. Krupke at 8:23 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
18 October 2004
EXPECT DELAYS: INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AT WORK
According to Britain's
Independent, the government of Red China is
attempting to derail efforts to sanction the government of Sudan over ongoing violence in its Darfur region.
For the past six years Beijing has been the Sudanese government's main backer, buying 70 per cent of its exports, servicing its $20bn debt and supplying the Khartoum government with most of its weapons.So far, on Sudan, the Arab League has expressed solidarity with Khartoum, the European Union has declared that Darfur does not meet the standard for "genocide", and now China is chafing, too.
Global test: failed.
However, rest in the knowledge that there will be massive protest marches in front of Chinese embassies around the globe, wherein progressive people with gigantic puppets will sing, sign petitions, stage "die-ins", and burn PRC flags next to effigies of Hu Jintao.
I'm certain of it.
Ofc. Krupke at 7:53 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
14 October 2004
Okay, so funny thing, that literally just happened: I was snug in my bed just drifting off to sleep (I'm on midnights this month, so I sleep during the day), when I was awakened by the sound of a door opening, and a voice. This isn't unusual as I live in an apartment complex full of people with normal activity cycles; I'm just glad when they're not running the leaf blowers. But something about the quality of the sound made me snap awake.
I reached over and scooped up my SCPD-issue Glock and made a careful exit from the room, moving slowly and stealthily down the hall, gun at the ready. I made it into the living room, where I noticed the lock knob on the front door was turned to the wrong position.
What the hell? I know
I locked that thing.It was then that I heard a noise coming from the kitchen. I
pied the corner, gun in the low ready position, and came upon the complex maintenance man, crouched down and working on the garbage disposal, in accordance with the work request I had made at the rental office a day or two ago.
"Oh, sorry," I said out loud, and he jumped. He apologized for not realizing anyone was at home. It all ended happily: I put the gun away, and he fixed the disposal. Hopefully, they'll call next time.
So let that be a warning to the assorted creeps, ne'er-do-wells, and freelance socialists of the Southern City metro area - you burgle Castle Krupke at your peril. Also, it's a little dicey to do appliance repair.
Still, I'm proud that I achieved tactical advantage on him without his ever knowing I was there. I've still got it.
Ofc. Krupke at 2:44 PM
Permalink |
---------------------
Dale Franks at QandO Blog presents a
condensed version of the final Presidential Debate that's pretty funny. A sample:
Q: Do you believe homosexuality is a choice?
Bush: I dunno. But we have a country where people can do whatever the hell they want. (Unless it's you know, icky, like drug use or prostitution.) But, whatever, this is decision we need to make democratically, not through the courts.
Kerry: We're all God's Children. Besides, Dick Cheney's daughter is a lesbo. Anyway, it's not a choice. Oh, and we need partnership rights. And the states should decide. Analogcabin: The Right: Your one-stop shop for reactionary 'tude.
Ofc. Krupke at 10:23 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
13 October 2004
U.S., and, for the first time, Iraqi investigators are conducting a forensic excavation at the site of a mass grave in northern Iraq. Here's a bleak
piece on it from the BBC. Note, especially, this part at the end:
Mr Kehoe said that work to uncover graves around Iraq, where about 300,000 people are thought to have been killed during Saddam Hussein's regime, was slow as experienced European investigators were not taking part.
The Europeans, he said, were staying away as the evidence might be used eventually to put Saddam Hussein to death.Well, at least they've got their priorities straight.
Ofc. Krupke at 8:08 PM
Permalink |
---------------------
Irony, thy name is
Rather.
Ofc. Krupke at 11:09 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
12 October 2004
From a 10 October
interview with the
New York Times Magazine:
When I asked Kerry what it would take for Americans to feel safe again, he displayed a much less apocalyptic worldview. "We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they're a nuisance," Kerry said. "As a former law-enforcement person, I know we're never going to end prostitution. We're never going to end illegal gambling. But we're going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn't on the rise. It isn't threatening people's lives every day, and fundamentally, it's something that you continue to fight, but it's not threatening the fabric of your life."And jaywalking, too, presumably.
Speaking as a
current "law enforcement person" (I love that phrase, by the way; I should start using it: "Hello, I'm Officer Krupke, and I'll be your law-enforcement person today. Now, you wanna tell me what you two halfwits are fighting about?"), let me point out that prostitution and illegal gambling are not violent crimes. There are, in fact, credible and intelligent arguments that these things should not even be illegal in the first place. The comparison is nonsensical.
And more to the point,
Eugene Volokh points out:
The way law enforcement has dealt with prostitution and illegal gambling is by occasionally trying to shut down the most visible and obvious instances, tolerating what is likely millions of violations of the law per year, de jure legalizing many sorts of gambling, and de jure legalizing one sort of prostitution in Nevada, and de facto legalizing many sorts of prostitution almost everywhere; as best I can tell, "escort services" are very rarely prosecuted, to the point that they are listed in the Yellow Pages.
These are examples of practical surrender, or at least a cease-fire punctuated by occasional but largely half-hearted and ineffectual sorties.It's not hard to see what the equivalent counter-terrorism policy would look like: a great deal of ignoring the problem until something happens, which will be followed by a missile strike here and there, some behind-the-scenes stuff that, while welcome, will have little practical result, and loud speeches to international bodies to the effect that WE WILL NOT TOLERATE and WE CONDEMN IN THE STRONGEST TERMS, until people move on to the next topic.
Sound familiar?Kerry's desire to "get back to where we were" is somewhat akin to saying at the dawn of the Cold War that we needed to "get back" to where we were when the Commies didn't have the Bomb. Where we were was in denial about the dangers we faced.
The rest of the article is interesting as well, especially Kerry's comments on whether 9-11 "changed" him. His answer is, no, that he was already ahead of the curve on terrorism already, it just deepened his resolve. Though the article is careful to burnish Kerry's image, it also gives strong credence to the oft-repeated charge that Kerry, despite his tough campaign-trail talk, is an advocate of the law-enforcement model of counterterrorism as opposed to the military model. It's noticeable that Kerry uses the fact that his work on international crime issues (much of it laudable, by the way) dovetails to some degree with terrorism as a way to blur the line between the two. Though author Matt Bai seems impressed with it as revolutionary, there is little in Kerry's instinctive approach that differs from the pre-9-11 flavor of counterterrorism that was used in the West to resoundingly little success. The more he talks about it, the more one gets the sense that, as Commander-in-Chief, Kerry would make a pretty good Attorney General.
Ofc. Krupke at 10:21 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
10 October 2004
An observation:
Well, okay, not so much an observation as a bitter suspicion:
If Australian Prime Minister John Howard had lost his re-election bid, there would be many chin-stroking editorials on this side of the Pacific on the subject of how generally disastrous President Bush's foreign policy has been, on the occasion of the electoral defeat of one of his principal allies. It would be considered a stinging rebuke, and a signal that the War on Terror was foundering badly.
Of course, since Howard won, and won handily (
The Age, in an
article that requires registration, called it a "thumping victory"), everyone will just whistle and look the other way.
No news is good news. Or maybe it's the other way around.
Ofc. Krupke at 7:42 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
07 October 2004
In the latest edition of
Analogcabin: The Profane, ace Profanity Correspondent Sue asks, essentially, why Bush-supporters aren't mad about the conduct of the Iraq war. Since no one else is likely to, I thought I'd respond. This was originally going in the comments section of Sue's blog, until it became too long and unhinged. Call it the Krupke Doctrine.
Anyway, the short version is that we
are mad.
But not mad enough to turn the whole shooting match over to John Kerry. Not mad enough to believe that mistakes the Bush administration has made in Iraq (disbanding the Iraqi Army, failing to crush Fallujah, not cracking down mercilessly on looters early on, etc.) would have changed perceptions much had they been avoided.
I mean, I can see the NYT editorials now: Expressing shock that Iraqis taking their first, albeit wild, taste of freedom were met by bullets and force from the U.S. That the Bush administration cynically reactivated the very army that had oppressed Iraqis so long to serve their own neo-colonial interests. That an entire Iraqi city was punished for the sins of a few rather than a more measured approach taken. And on and on.
And we're not mad enough not to realize that opponents of the war put forward no realistic alternatives to the continued status quo: Saddam playing footsie with the inspectors and shooting at American warplanes trying to enforce the U.N.'s ceasefire agreement, while Arab anger seethed at the U.S. because the Iraqis were suffering under sanctions, and American "allies" abetted by a byzantine and corrupt U.N. bureaucracy aggravated that suffering through the grotesque Oil-For-Food program. Would another round of this really have helped matters?
You mention Sudan and North Korea as festering global problems, and you're absolutely right. But what is the point of comparison? Are you suggesting that North Korea should have been invaded instead? And while the slaughter in Sudan is nothing short of horrifying, what is to be done? If you're going to argue that the Iraq war was wrong because Saddam wasn't a threat to U.S. security, what threat does Sudan pose?
Saddam was a "bad egg", as you say. But more than that, he was a bad egg
on whom every other approach had been tried in the dozen years since the Gulf War. You may not agree, but can you at least understand how someone might think that allowing Saddam to play his games for years and years to come would provide a rotten role model for a North Korea or Sudan (or Iran, for that matter): "Hey guys, don't sweat it. You can fuck with these people for
years and nothing will happen to you"?
So, that, off the top of my head, is what makes me tick. Well, you wanted to know.
Ofc. Krupke at 1:20 PM
Permalink |
---------------------
02 October 2004
In what may be the biggest coup in American journalism since Bob Woodward interviewed a guy in a coma, the intrepid
Frank J. has managed to
acquire the actual handwritten notes made by President Bush and Senator Kerry at their podiums during the first Presidential Debate in Coral Gables.
The notes themselves were vetted using a rigorous document authentication procedure developed by CBS, which consists of asking, "Can this possibly be used to embarrass President Bush?"
Kerry's note pageBush's note pageEat your heart out, Dan Rather.
Ofc. Krupke at 7:42 AM
Permalink |
---------------------
01 October 2004
Some thoughts:
Going into the debates, my prediction was that Kerry would have the advantage on substance, but lack on style. That is, he would make good and pointed arguments (which is, after all, what challengers do), but would come off as arrogant, stuffy, and unlikable, as compared to President Bush.
I have to say, though, that Kerry surprised me. I thought he did quite well, and turned in a far better performance on style than I had expected. He appeared relaxed, composed, and did very well at turning President Bush's rhetoric against him. Kerry was helped, of course, by the fact that Bush had a lot of moments where he seemed rattled and off balance (though he had his moments, as well). Overall, I thought it was a good debate.
As a conservative, it was of course frustrating to watch Bush bobble his arguments, and fail to hit Kerry's vulnerabilities. Chief among these is his constant harping on the bringing in of allies to Iraq, a vague, glib theme that ignores the reality of American military supremacy in the world, and which was
undercut yet again last week. Bush unforgivably let his opponent get away with it again and again, though finally responding with his best line of the night, imagining a Kerry sales pitch to the U.N. or Arab League: "Come join us for a grand diversion!" Not bad, but too little, too late. Kerry likes to talk about how building a "grand alliance" is the "right way", but is insufferably coy about who would staff it or what they would have to be offered. And as for the notion of a "global test"? Oy, don't get me started. My favorite Kerry moment came when he declared in a macho voice, pounding the podium for emphasis, "We're going to
have that summit!" Oh, I can hear the rattle of trembling jihadis from here.
Kerry also had some moments of jaw-dropping chutzpah, invoking Reagan when he never had a kind word for him before, or Bush 41 when Kerry opposed the Gulf War in the first place. Or scolding Bush for dropping the Kyoto Protocol when he
blasted it himself. Perhaps the worst was when he brought up Vietnam (again), saying, "It is vital for us not to confuse the war with the warriors." Well, you should know, shouldn't you, Genghis?
I couldn't believe Kerry not only brought up Darfur, but tried to sell it implicitly as an example of how the war in Iraq has made the world more dangerous. I mean, if you want an example of how Kerry's vaunted U.N. and "community of nations" can mount a
Kafkaesque parody of crisis response, look no further. And they don't have nearly the
profit potential in Sudan as they had in Iraq. The bit about De Gaulle was funny, too. When De Gaulle made the comment about the word of the President, he was talking about Kennedy. To steal one of the great political put-downs of our times, Senator Kerry, you're no Jack Kennedy. Besides, anyone who cites Charles "I want all the Americans out
now" De Gaulle as some steadfast ally of the United States needs to do a little rethink.
It was nice to see both candidates manage some class on the question about Kerry's character (which was a lame question), though I thought Bush had the edge on graciousness. I also liked that at the conclusion of the debate, Bush could clearly be heard saying "Good job" to Kerry as they shook hands off-camera. Nice.
There's more, but I'm tired.
Krupke's Unilateral Pre-Emptive Post-Debate Analysis: Advantage Kerry. Doesn't mean he's not selling pie-in-the-sky internationalist snake oil, but still. A good night for the gentleman from Massachusetts.
Ofc. Krupke at 1:45 PM
Permalink |
---------------------